Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Ball et al v. East Franklin Superette and Kitchen LLC
as 3:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ball, Ted Toms, Sofia Chabot and others
Defendant:
East Franklin Superette and Kitchen LLC dba East Frank Superette and Kitchen and East Franklin Superette and Kitchen LLC doing business as East Frank Superette and Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 a False Designations of Origin, False Descriptions (Lanham Act)
Ball v. Hawkins
as 1:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Ball
Respondent:
Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corriher v. Richland Diversified Industries, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Theodore H. Corriher
Defendant:
Richland Diversified Industries, Inc., All Family Craft, Inc., Charger Deck Boat, Inc. and others
Rankin Bey v. Ball et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Defendant:
FNU McPherson, Mike Slayer, FNU Melton and others
Plaintiff:
Napoleon J. Rankin Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oppenheimer v. Thurner et al
as 3:2019cv00211
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Maria Martinez-Murphy, W.T. Ball, Sonoma Commercial Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Torres v. Ball et al
as 1:2019cv00094
Defendant:
Dane R. Onderdonk, Nathan Ball and Timothy R. Taylor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Torres v. Ball et al
as 1:2018cv00359
Defendant:
Dane R. Onderdonk, Nathan Ball and T. R. Taylor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Ball v. Berryhill
as 5:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Linda G. Ball
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ball v. Slagle
as 1:2018cv00091
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Ball
Respondent:
Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Solomon et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jordan Andrew Jones
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, W. David Guice, Frank L. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
