Cases 21 - 30 of 9,766
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SCHROEDER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04559
Plaintiff:
ANDREW D SCHROEDER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MILLER et al v. DEMATTIA et al
as 2:2024cv04328
Plaintiff:
NAEEM MILLER, NAEEM WILLIAMS, YSNAISHA MILLER and others
Defendant:
GREGORY DEMATTIA, MURAD MUHAMMAD, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 74.105.169.67
as 2:2024cv04196
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 74.105.169.67
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CARDENAS v. CREDITORS RELIEF LLC
as 2:2024cv04214
Plaintiff:
ERICA CARDENAS
Defendant:
CREDITORS RELIEF LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
DILLARD v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
DERECK DILLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANCHEZ v. OKAH
as 2:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STELLA OKAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FUJIFILM CORPORATION v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
as 1:2024cv04017
Plaintiff:
FUJIFILM CORPORATION
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
