Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Gamez v. Court Room Part 41 et al
as 1:2011cv04458
Defendant:
All Defendants Held Accountable in Their Individual Capacities, All Persons Known and Unknown Within or Not Within Government Capacity, Court Room Part 41 and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. State and Municipality of N.Y. et al
as 1:2011cv04320
Defendant:
P.O. Brisbain, Warden Davis, Federal and State Drug Enforcement Agencies and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. The State and Municipality of N.Y. et al
as 1:2011cv04317
Defendant:
D.O.C. amd Commands, The Division of Criminal Justice Services- Chauncey Parker, Martin Horn, P.O. Brisbain and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. The State and Municipality of N.Y. et al
as 1:2011cv03374
Defendant:
All Defendants Held Accountable in Their Individual Capacities, All Persons Known and Unknown Within or Not Within Government Capacity, D.O.C. and Commands and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. State of New York D.O.C and Commands et al
as 1:2011cv01918
Defendant:
All "Private Actors" and Evil Disposed Active Connicing Agents Working at the [E]ncouragement of the NYPD, Et al, Martin Horn, State of New York D.O.C and Commands and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Esurance v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 1:2008cv01600
Plaintiff:
Esurance
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency and Lancelot Ho
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Khan v. United States Drug Enforcement Agency
as 1:2007cv04474
Plaintiff:
Gianina Williams Khan
Defendant:
United States Drug Enforcement Agency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
