Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Madden v. City of New York
as 1:2020cv04295
Defendant:
City of New York
Plaintiff:
Steven Madden
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Wildflower + Co., Inc. v. Steven Madden, Ltd. et al
as 1:2020cv00586
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Amazon.com, Inc., Macy's, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Wildflower + Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Medina v. Project Builders Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06336
Defendant:
Project Builders Group LLC, Paris Giannopulos, Maxie Development LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Medina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Matthews 33 1/3 v. Prager et al
as 2:2018cv04227
Plaintiff:
Michael Matthews 33 1/3
Defendant:
Det Kevin M. Madden, Jared A Kasschau, Judge David Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00503
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
