Cases 41 - 50 of 215
Abbot Paint and Varnish v. Yaccarino et al
as 1:2020cv04770
Defendant:
Yougez Woodworking, Ray Birdsall, John Kaber and others
Plaintiff:
Abbot Paint and Varnish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ates v. Azrack et al
as 2:2020cv03590
Defendant:
Mark C. Dillon, Linda Christopher, Ruth C. Balkin and others
Plaintiff:
Murat Ates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prucha et al v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv03501
Plaintiff:
Pauline Prucha and Ray Prucha
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Pender et al v. Foley et al
as 1:2020cv03117
Defendant:
Police Informant John/Jane Doe, The City of New York, Adjie O. Headed and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Midgette, Angela Pender, Ray Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. USA
as 1:2020cv03142
Petitioner:
Reavon Ricardo Brown and Ray Ray
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Faistman Royce v. Sunny's Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02174
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Adam Mian, Shafqat Chaudhry and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Faistman Royce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ates v. Altiner et al
as 2:2020cv01477
Defendant:
Paul B. Harding, Mark C. Dillion, Linda Christopher and others
Plaintiff:
Murat Ates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lozaro et al v. Liberty Car Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07314
Plaintiff:
Jose Molina and Nataly Lozaro
Defendant:
Liberty Car Service, Inc. and Ray Perry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
