Cases 61 - 70 of 165
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Secard v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv04872
Defendant:
Amanda Gentile, Hogan Lovells Us LLP, Leah N. Jacob and others
Plaintiff:
Glen Secard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Craig v. Genius Media Group, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00983
Plaintiff:
Glen Craig
Defendant:
Genius Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morris v. Arresting Officer Shield # 900586
as 1:2016cv06595
Defendant:
Arresting Officer Shield # 900586, Judge D. Fitzgerald and Lawyer Glen F. Hardy
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morris
DA Manhattan:
Cyrus Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunes et al v. Rob-Glen Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06207
Plaintiff:
Oscar Canales, Hember Gonzalez Escobar, Urbano Ortiz Nunes and others
Defendant:
Bruce Klein and Rob-Glen Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05914
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
