Cases 61 - 70 of 156
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
T-Mobile Northeast LLC v. Warren, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv02751
Defendant:
Beach Lane Management, Inc., Dean Realty LLC, Marz Realty, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Northeast LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Mongiove et al v. Nate's Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv01024
Defendant:
Bernard Glezerman, Simon Lorbert, Nate's Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Yarinel Gonzalez and Peter Mongiove
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Towns v. Cornerstone Baptist Church et al
as 1:2014cv06809
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Aker, III, Michael R. Bloomberg, William J. Bratton and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel A. Towns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gadsden v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv06687
Defendant:
City of New York, Det. Ryan Lane and Undercover Officer #109
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gadsden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05737
Defendant:
Officer Lameen Barnes, Captain Budnarine Behari, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krieg v. Bayrodt et al
as 1:2014cv04434
Defendant:
Det. Gerard Bayrodt, NYC Police Sergeant Michael Healy and Ryan Lane
Plaintiff:
Christopher Krieg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv03213
Defendant:
Claudio Ballard, Kenneth Bayne, Jonathan Bracken and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Trimarco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
