Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Morales v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv05210
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1 through 10 and Matthew Reich
Plaintiff:
Courtney Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Howard v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03291
Plaintiff:
Clayton Howard
Defendant:
State Of New York, City of New York, Richmond County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. ATYG LLC
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Courtney Taylor
Defendant:
ATYG LLC doing business as Steady Capital Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cooper et al v. Boone et al
as 1:2023cv07193
Plaintiff:
Courtney Cooper and Abdo P. Faissal
Defendant:
Karen Boone, John Callaghan, Elizabeth F. Coddington and others
Fleming v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
Courtney Fleming
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Courtney v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2022cv07872
Plaintiff:
Dshawna Courtney
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Robert Breuer, Michael Kenefick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
