Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Adams v. Chapman et al
as 1:2024cv05389
Defendant:
Edward Chapman, Frank Porter, Dabra Harrioat and others
Plaintiff:
Dimetreus Adams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Merritt v. Chapman et al
as 1:2024cv03675
Defendant:
Sheryl Lauren Chapman and Jeffrey Chapman
Plaintiff:
Angela Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Chapman et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv02070
Plaintiff:
Barbara Chapman, Patricia Frisbie, Margaret Craig and others
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Chapman v. Maycock
as 1:2021cv04940
Plaintiff:
Malachi Chapman
Defendant:
Tashana Maycock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv03906
Plaintiff:
Malachi Chapman
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00910
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Tonisha Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walters v. TC PipeLines, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00675
Defendant:
Gloria Hartl, Malyn K. Malquist, Stanley Graham Chapman, III and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walters
Bexil Advisers LLC v. MVC Capital, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06065
Defendant:
Douglas Kass, John Chapman, Robert Knapp and others
Plaintiff:
Bexil Advisers LLC
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
