Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Harte v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Robert M. Schechter, Esq., Adrian Llewellyn, PA, Alexis Duncan, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Harte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lind v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv02182
Plaintiff:
Casey Lind
Defendant:
National Park Service, United States Department of Interior and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Lind et al v. KAR Engineering, P.C.
as 1:2013cv07375
Defendant:
KAR Engineering, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Casey Lind and Joseph Lind
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pantoliano v. Lind
as 1:2012cv02021
Defendant:
Esq. Richard B. Lind
Plaintiff:
Katosh Pantoliano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linde v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
as 1:2009cv01634
Plaintiff:
Randolph Eric Linde
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secuity and Commissioner of Social Secuity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Linde et al v. Arab Bank, PLC
as 1:2004cv02799
Plaintiff:
Frederick and Sherri Mandell, Matanya Nathansen, Michael Goldstein and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Mercantile Discount Bank Ltd., Israel Discount Bank of New York, Israel Discount Bank Ltd. and others
Respondent:
Israel Discount Bank, Ltd.
Defendant:
Arab Bank, PLC
Amicus Curiae:
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan and Union of Arab Banks
Interested Party:
Jacob Raz, Sayles Werbner, P.C. and David Law Firm, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
