Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Thompson v. Fidelity American Holdings Corporation et al
as 7:2016cv00494
Plaintiff:
Thomas Thompson
Defendant:
Fidelity American Holdings Corporation and Linda Luther
Counter_claimant:
Fidelity American Holdings Corporation and Linda Luther
Counter_defendant:
Thomas Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Reid v. Fifth Third Bank
as 6:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Reid and Luther D. Reid
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jackson v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00756
Plaintiff:
Edward Luther Jackson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mungo v. Luther et al
as 9:2012cv01306
Plaintiff:
Marcus Mungo
Defendant:
Brian E. Luther, Jody E. Slater, Douglas J. Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burdick et al v. Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. et al
as 3:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
Cindy Burdick and Dale A. Luther
Defendant:
Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P., Brookfield Asset Management, LLC, Brookfield Renewable Power, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SWF, L.P. et al v. Spa Steel Products Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01025
Petitioner:
SWF, L.P. and BBL Construction Services, LLC
Respondent:
SPA Steel Products Co., Inc. , Robert Katzman, Bollam, Sheedy, Torani & Co, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Thomas v. Racette
as 9:2011cv00262
Petitioner:
Luther A, Thomas
Respondent:
Steven E. Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey v. Luther et al
as 9:2009cv00599
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harvey
Defendant:
Judge Luther, Patrick Kirk, John Crandall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. Luther et al
as 6:2009cv00599
Plaintiff:
Gregory Harvey
Defendant:
Judge Luther, Patrick Kirk, John Crandall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
