Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Woods v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Jill Grant, John or Jane Does 11-15, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everson v. Noeth
as 9:2020cv00084
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Shawndell Everson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. Noeth
as 9:2019cv01495
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Anthony Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 9:2019cv01484
Defendant:
Fischer, Faucette, Hollenbeck and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strauss v. Noeth
as 9:2019cv01360
Respondent:
Attica Correctional Facility and Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Charles D. Strauss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crosby v. Noeth
as 9:2019cv00694
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Jerry Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffith v. Annucci et al
as 9:2019cv00354
Defendant:
Mitchel Troy, Attica Correctional Facility, Larry Nolan and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Griffith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larkins v. Noeth
as 9:2018cv01491
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Ronald Larkins and Ronald James Larkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrasquillo-Fuent v. Noeth
as 9:2018cv00415
Respondent:
Joseph Noeth
Petitioner:
Emilier Carrasquillo-Fuent and Emilier Carrasquillo-Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alsaifullah v. Noeth
as 9:2018cv00176
Petitioner:
Talib Alsaifullah
Respondent:
Superintendent Noeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
