Cases 21 - 30 of 1,114
Decker Advertising Inc. v. Delaware County, New York et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Decker Advertising Inc.
Defendant:
Delaware County, New York, Tina Mole, Arthur Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Struble v. Tope
as 9:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
David E. Struble
Respondent:
Danielle Tope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dudley v. Hochul et al
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Governor Kathy Hochul, New York State, Dr. James V. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Mitchell et al
as 9:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Gibson
Defendant:
Mitchell, E. Richards, Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Hicks et al
as 9:2023cv01465
Defendant:
John Doe C, J. Hicks, John Doe A and others
Plaintiff:
Elisha Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linton v. Duprey
as 5:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Linton
Defendant:
Riley E. Duprey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Lettieri v. Garver et al
as 9:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Randall E. Garver and Michael Mockwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Gaasbeck v. O'Dell et al
as 1:2023cv01483
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Van Gaasbeck
Defendant:
Kevin D. O'Dell, Michael J. Raneri and Raneri, Light & ODell, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Williams v. Bieda et al
as 9:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Chihe Williams
Defendant:
Correction Officer Kevin Bieda and Sergeant E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
