Cases 21 - 30 of 461
Engles v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Jessie Engles and Jesse Engles
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Brian Fisher, Diane Van Buren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Ejenie H. Mayfield
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
McCullough v. Graves et al
as 5:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
John H. McCullough, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Brian Graves, Officer Michaela Frost and Officer Pritchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiley v. Annucci et al
as 9:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Wiley
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Joseph H. Noeth, Caringi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Besong v. Dougherty et al
as 1:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Loic N. Besong
Defendant:
Michael J. Dougherty, John H. Larrabee and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department
as 9:2023cv00905
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Younis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tamarae H Younis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Baptiste v. Doe et al
as 9:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Anthony H. Baptiste
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
