Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Ariola v. LaClair et al
as 9:2008cv00116
Petitioner:
Christopher D. Ariola
Respondent:
Darwin LaClair and New York State Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Champion v. Connell et al
as 9:2007cv01266
Petitioner:
Richard Champion
Respondent:
Susan Connell, George Pataki, Robert Dennison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez v. Onondaga County Justice Center Jail et al
as 5:2007cv01098
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center Jail, Onondaga Department of Correctional Services-Jamesville, New York State Division of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina v. Berbary et al
as 9:2007cv01038
Petitioner:
Richard D. Medina
Respondent:
J. Berbary and New York State Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Combes v. The New York State Division of Parole
as 9:2007cv00934
Plaintiff:
George Combes
Defendant:
The New York State Division of Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suce v. Taylor et al
as 9:2007cv00841
Petitioner:
Luciano Suce
Respondent:
Justin A. Taylor, New York State Division of Parole and Warren D. Barkley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Inman v. Harder et al
as 9:2007cv00587
Petitioner:
Barry W. Inman
Respondent:
David Harder, New York State Division of Parole and New York State Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raheem v. Smith et al
as 9:2007cv00202
Petitioner:
Shu'aib Raheem
Respondent:
Joseph T. Smith, Joseph T. Smith, New York State Division of Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
