Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Peterson v. Onondaga County
as 9:2017cv01133
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Onondaga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Binghamton Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
Ronald Donell Peterson
Defendant:
Binghamton Police Department, Brendan Whalen, Jena Sacco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00992
Plaintiff:
Ann Peterson and Donald Peterson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. The People of the State of New York
as 9:2017cv00482
Petitioner:
Carlos Peterson
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parish et al v. Kosinski et al
as 5:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
Matthew Parish , Thomas Jaccarino , Tom Connolly and others
Defendant:
Peter S. Kosinski , Douglas A. Kellner , Andrew J. Spano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Kyler et al
as 5:2016cv00876
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Ray A. Kyles and Joseph D. Gallery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pidot et al v. New York State Board Of Elections et al
as 1:2016cv00859
Plaintiff:
Philip Pidot , Nancy Hawkins and Steven Axelman
Defendant:
New York State Board Of Elections , Suffolk County Board of Elections , Nassau County Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Miller
as 9:2016cv00743
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
Thomas J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. The People of the State of New York
as 9:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
Carlos Peterson
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. The People of the State of New York
as 9:2015cv01422
Petitioner:
Carlos Peterson
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
