Cases 31 - 40 of 189
Greathouse v. Meddaugh et al
as 9:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Leon Greathouse
Defendant:
Sgt. K. Meddaugh, RN Mary Thompson, Officer Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquardt Switches, Inc. et al v. Phillips-Medisize, LLC
as 5:2021cv00972
Plaintiff:
Marquardt Switches, Inc. and Marquardt Mexico S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
Defendant:
Phillips-Medisize, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Phillips v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2021cv00970
Plaintiff:
Clifton A. Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
DOCCS, New York State, Melissa Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Uhler et al
as 9:2021cv00776
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Woody, Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinley v. Moore et al
as 9:2021cv00678
Defendant:
C.O. Claudio Robustiano, C.O. William Murray, C.O. Carmen Matrese and others
Plaintiff:
Mark McKinley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allam v. Phillips et al
as 5:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Allam, Sr.
Defendant:
Auto Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual and Samantha Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan
as 1:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mary Phillips
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Marsh v. Saul
as 5:2020cv01454
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Campbell v.Bartlett
as 9:2020cv01375
Respondent:
John Rich and Rickey Bartlett
Petitioner:
Phillip M. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
