Cases 41 - 50 of 630
Bristol et al v. Town of Camden et al
as 6:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Todd Bristol, Kimberly Bristol and Sugar Shack's Water Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Camden, Town of Camden Planning Board, Town of Camden Town Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Graham v. Clark et al
as 9:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Leon Graham
Defendant:
Eric Clark, Jacob Proctor, Connor Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jakes-Johnson v. USA
as 5:2022cv00774
Petitioner:
Benjamin Jakes-Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Phillips et al
as 9:2022cv00747
Plaintiff:
Kamar Johnson
Defendant:
N. Phillips, M. Goff, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
DOCCS, Anthony Annucci, Central Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Johnson
Defendant:
DOCCS and Clinton Correctional Facility CO Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dusen-Janz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kristin Van Dusen-Janz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, John Barrett, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
