Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Ashline v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
April May Ashline
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chandler v. Skipper et al
as 3:2024cv00206
Defendant:
Mark Skipper, Skip Archimedes, Michael Maloy and others
Plaintiff:
April Chandler
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
April A. Snyder
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. Grover et al
as 5:2022cv00911
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Richard Grover, Jr., Oneida Healthcare Center, April I. Stanistreet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Bechard v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00743
Plaintiff:
April Bechard
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Werkheiser v. County of Broome et al
as 3:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Samantha Werkheiser and Samantha Stone
Defendant:
County of Broome, Veronica Gorman, Thomas Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goods v. Baldner
as 1:2021cv01357
Plaintiff:
April M. Goods
Defendant:
Christopher G. Baldner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashbourne et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Co.
as 1:2021cv00887
Plaintiff:
Carrie Ashbourne, Jessica Conner, Brandy Daniels and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
