Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fish v. Oshkosh Defense, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
Nancy Fish
Defendant:
Oshkosh Defense, LLC, Oshkosh Corporation and Kalyn Siebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jane Doe et al v. Zucker et al
as 1:2020cv00840
Plaintiff:
Jane Joe, Jane Boe, Sr., Childrens Health Defense and others
Defendant:
Randall Squier, David P. Bennardo, New York State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pare v. Valet Park of America et al
as 1:2019cv00206
Defendant:
Paul O Gaetone, Esq., Damian Tucker, Esq., John Hogan, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Louis Pare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense, LLC et al
as 1:2018mc00002
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc., Preferred Law, PLLC and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Benton et al v. Global Companies, LLC
as 1:2016cv00125
Plaintiff:
Charlene Benton , County of Albany , Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Global Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604
O'Dell v. Department of Defense
as 5:2013mc00035
Petitioner:
Jeffrey O'Dell
Respondent:
Department of Defense
Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Town of Sanford, New York
as 3:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council and Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy
Defendant:
Town of Sanford, New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demos v. The U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 9:2013cv00071
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
The U.S. Secretary of Defense, The U.S. Secretary of State, The U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eric Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
