Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Orlando, Jr v. Liberty Ashes, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09434
Defendant:
Liberty Ashes, Inc. , Francesco Bellino , Michael Bellino, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Orlando, Jr and Leonard Menna, Jr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ash v. Sterling National Bank et al
as 1:2015cv08342
Plaintiff:
Jay Ash
Defendant:
Sterling National Bank, N.Y. National Bank and M. Futterman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coraud LLC et al v. Kidville Franchise Company, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv09105
Plaintiff:
Coraud LLC
Defendant:
Kidville Franchise Company, LLC, Andrew Stenzler, Harry R. Harwood, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ash v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv06812
Plaintiff:
Tarrence Konard Ash
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan and Peggi Healy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Binaku Realty Co. Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06818
Plaintiff:
Jay M. Ash
Defendant:
Binaku Realty Co. Inc., Paul Gecaj and Andrew Lehrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feldman v. NOMORERACK.COM, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv06483
Plaintiff:
Michelle Feldman
Defendant:
NOMORERACK.COM, INC., Deepak Agarwal, Vipesh Arageal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ash v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2014cv04878
Plaintiff:
Tarrence Konard Ash
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Correct Care Services
as 1:2014cv01856
Plaintiff:
Ashely M. Jones
Defendant:
Correct Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv06755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
