Cases 31 - 40 of 439
Boyd v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Janet Boyd
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, David R. Epstein and others
Wang v. Seagen Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, Ph.D., David R. Epstein and others
In re Seagen, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2023cv03254
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Seagen Inc., Felix Baker, Ph.D., David R. Epstein and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sandra Ober, Elaine Wang and Janet Boyd
Tedder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv02812
Plaintiff:
William Tedder, Maureen Cobb, Richard Tyler and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
BakeMark USA LLC v. Negron et al
as 1:2023cv02360
Plaintiff:
BakeMark USA LLC
Defendant:
Brian Negron, Jose Negron Jr., Bakers Depot LLC and others
Baker v. Gallo et al
as 7:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Lisa Baker
Defendant:
David G. Gallo, Esq., Bert T. Bowler, CFP and Estate of Karl Pirnat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts L.L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo
Defendant:
Baker Botts L.L.P., Richard B. Harper, Esq., Robert Lawrence Mairer, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carlisle v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01956
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Baker v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Kristine Baker
Defendant:
Raldino Powell, Superintendent Eileen Russell, Ellen Gomprecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vesely v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Gordon Vesely
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Eileen P. Drake, Gail Baker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
