Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Monroe v. Gerbing et al
as 1:2016cv02818
Plaintiff:
Dwinel Monroe
Defendant:
Kathleen Gerbing, Anthony J. Annucci, Carl J. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caceres et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01949
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Caceres, Tony Walton, Lisa Santo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Matthews et al. v. Black Elk Energy Offshore Operations, LLC et al.
as 1:2015cv09362
Plaintiff:
White Marlin Energy Services, Inc., Carolyn Matthews, Carl Hammond and others
Defendant:
PPVA Black Elk (Equity) LLC, Mark Nordlicht, Iron Island Technologies Inc. and others
Nominal Defendant:
Black Elk Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv02019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hammond v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv01853
Plaintiff:
Tamisin Hammond
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Healthcare A G, Bayer Pharma A G and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammond II v. Chipolte et al
as 1:2013cv07669
Plaintiff:
Reginald Adae Hammond II
Defendant:
Chipolte et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. Walker et al
as 1:2013cv07493
Plaintiff:
Reginald Adae Hammond, II
Defendant:
Stacey Walker and Red Lobster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. 311
as 1:2013cv07504
Plaintiff:
Reginald Adae Hammond, II
Defendant:
311
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. License Food Vendor - C3787 et al
as 1:2013cv07494
Plaintiff:
Reginald Adae Hammond, II
Defendant:
License Food Vendor - C3787, License Food Vendor - 4407 and Poland Springs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
