Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Johnson v. Reid et al
as 1:2009cv03626
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Reid, Dixon and Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bloomberg et al
as 1:2009cv02454
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Michael Bloomberg, Jonathan Mintz and Thomas Frieden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01959
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Denicola et al
as 1:2008cv09307
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Frank Denicola, Glasnapp Dariusz, Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ricks v. Doe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv09849
Plaintiff: James Ricks
Defendant: John Doe, John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv07246
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: Janice Smith, Melvin L. Williams and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vazquez v. Walker et al
as 1:2007cv05506
Plaintiff: Luis A. Vazquez
Defendant: John M. Walker, Jr., John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. The City of New York
as 1:2007cv04526
Plaintiff: Robert Johnson
Defendant: The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vasquez v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2007cv03020
Plaintiff: Luis A. Vasquez
Defendant: Jane Doe, Jane Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01993
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?