Cases 61 - 70 of 202
Scott v. Westchester County Jail et al
as 7:2018cv07203
Defendant:
C.O. Scaramuzzo, Sgt. Rene, Westchester County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Prince D. Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont v. Reyes et al
as 1:2018cv07120
Defendant:
County of Westchester, Marsha Brown Mitchell, Anneliese Bonforte and others
Plaintiff:
P. Stephen Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrella v. County of Westchester et al
as 1:2018cv05412
Plaintiff:
Arnold A. Estrella
Defendant:
County of Westchester, Santora and Thomalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
White v. County of Westchester et al
as 1:2018cv04429
Plaintiff:
Neil White
Defendant:
County of Westchester, New Rochelle Police Dept., Claudio Carpano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estrella v. County of Westchester et al
as 1:2018cv03639
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo A. Estrella
Defendant:
County of Westchester, Kaseithia M. Hewitt and Non-State Municipal Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. The County of Westchester et al
as 1:2018cv02691
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Farmer
Defendant:
The County of Westchester, The City of Peekskill, Peekskill Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv02246
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ross
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, County of Westchester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. County of Westchester Jail Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv01042
Plaintiff:
Philip B. Sutton
Defendant:
County of Westchester Jail Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
