Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Rajapakse v. Shaw
as 1:2020cv10473
Defendant:
Sey Farth Shaw, Robert Szyba, Seyfarth Shaw and others
Plaintiff:
Samantha D. Rajapakse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanigan v. Saul
as 7:2020cv09705
Plaintiff:
Terrence R. Lanigan
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aucoin et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11803
Plaintiff:
John Simadis, Evelyn Torres, Edward Springer and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Adams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11493
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cruciata, Timothy Branan, John Scanlon and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Lanigan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 7:2016cv07407
Plaintiff:
John Lanigan
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Seals v. St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital et al
as 1:2014cv04891
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, Chaim Kozlovsky, Victor Kizhner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanigan v. Metro-North RailRoad
as 7:2014cv00655
Plaintiff:
John Lanigan
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Bolden et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv01103
Plaintiff:
Natherlene Bolden
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, Bernard B. Kerik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv08956
Plaintiff:
Joyce Moore
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, Bernard B. Kerik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schwartz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv08626
Plaintiff:
Robert Schwartz
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, Bernard B. Kerik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
