Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03667
Plaintiff:
Jose L Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Penate et al v. DBTG Chambers LLC et al
as 1:2019cv08767
Defendant:
Joseph Ciriello and DBTG Chambers LLC
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Placido Bazan, Jose Santiago Santiago, Gustavo A Penate and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Romero et al v. Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al
as 1:2019cv00694
Plaintiff:
Diane Shields, Pamela Lee, Irene Thomas and others
Defendant:
MTA Bus Company, MTA Headquarters and Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Santiago v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv06606
Plaintiff:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv04803
Defendant:
United States Of America
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Santiago v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv02667
Petitioner:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santiago v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv04214
Plaintiff:
Jose Israel Santiago
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Santiago v. USA
as 1:2012cv04522
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dowett v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09485
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dowett
Defendant:
The City of New York , Edwin Perez , Harry G. Bonhomme and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feliciano v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07654
Plaintiff:
John Feliciano
Defendant:
The City of New York, Edwin Perez, Jose M. Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
