Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Monk v. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06056
Plaintiff:
David Monk
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Monk v. KLLM Transport Services, LLC et al
as 7:2022cv05887
Plaintiff:
Jaeden Monk
Defendant:
KLLM Transport Services, LLC and Tyrik DaShaun Masters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 au Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Monk et al v. Luna et al
as 1:2022cv03513
Plaintiff:
DAMON MONK and SHAAKIYRAH RAMKISSOON
Defendant:
ALBERTO LUNA, LEASE PLAN USA LT. and Lease Plan USA LT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 tm Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Calvino v. Tesla et al
as 1:2020cv00757
Plaintiff:
Ernest Calvino, Jr.
Defendant:
Elon Monk and Tesla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopez Pena v. Cole et al
as 1:2019cv10276
Defendant:
Jay Wineberg, David N. Keley, Terry Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Lopez Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04023
Plaintiff:
Richard Rosario
Defendant:
City Of New York , Gary Whitaker, Irwin Silverman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05446
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Monk
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correction, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk v. Racette
as 1:2014cv02967
Petitioner:
Terrance Monk
Respondent:
Racette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alroy v. The City of New York Law Department et al
as 1:2013cv06740
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alroy
Defendant:
The City of New York Law Department, Michael A. Cardozo, William A. Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
