Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Parra et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04059
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Irvin Parra, Robert Pell, Benjamin Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Harris et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2020cv07072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Feeder, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Defendant:
City Of New York, Corrections Officers Johns Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv06779
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-10, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Phillipe Berkowitz, Tyran Trotter, Joel Farrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Whitfield v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv01154
Plaintiff:
John Whitfield
Defendant:
Patricia Johnson, Jean King, Cori Rescigno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponder v. Prophete
as 1:2016cv01043
Plaintiff:
Brian Lamar Ponder
Defendant:
Donald Sony Prophete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Ponder v. Doe # 1 et al
as 1:2011cv05718
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ponder
Defendant:
John Doe # 1 and NYC Health and Hospital Corporation Correctional Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ponder v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv02441
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Ponder
Defendant:
The City of New York and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
