Cases 51 - 60 of 1,518
Buckley v. Officers of the Chautauqua County Court &Sheriff's Dept.
as 6:2023cv06429
Plaintiff:
William Buckley
Defendant:
Officers of the Chautauqua County Court &Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Otis Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
John T. Williams
Defendant:
Richard J Sullivan, Debra A Livingston, Robert A Katzmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nolan v. American Police and Troopers Coalition PAC
as 1:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
William Nolan
Defendant:
American Police and Troopers Coalition PAC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cole v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
William Cole
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Carlos Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Semelsberger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Brent William Semelsberger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Essrow et al v. J-Brock Properties, LLC
as 1:2023cv00609
Plaintiff:
Shannon Essrow and William Essrow
Defendant:
J-Brock Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Boyd v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2023cv06364
Plaintiff:
James Boyd
Defendant:
Superintendent J. Wolcott, Jane Doe's, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Wigdorski et al
as 6:2023cv06317
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Myers
Defendant:
Det. Adam Wigdorski, Det. Christopher Gerace, Det. Paul Fitzpatric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
