Cases 1 - 10 of 676
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Danielle S. Edwards
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maher v. Ledger Company
as 6:2024cv06255
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Maher
Defendant:
Ledger Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Isaacs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynn Isaacs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alessi v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alessi
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lockridge v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06211
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gerard Lockridge
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06181
Plaintiff:
Daniel Arden Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ector v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06161
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ector
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sauer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Sauer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
