Cases 1 - 10 of 175
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Michael Glenn Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Krick v. Town of Lyons et al
as 6:2024cv06178
Plaintiff:
Mr. Joshua Krick
Defendant:
Town of Lyons, Mr. Michael Bouwens, Marc Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Kim L. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01315
Plaintiff:
Shontea M. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01157
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Russell
as 6:2023cv06567
Petitioner:
LaShawn Lewis
Respondent:
Eileen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
Markiel Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Srgt Davis and Nurse Nesbit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
