Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Rodgers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Raymond v. Brusino et al
as 1:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
Dean Raymond
Defendant:
Karl P. Brusino, Domenic J. Senese, Marsha Gee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Rodgers
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Levan A. Walker
Defendant:
Dana Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01791
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Heather Elizabeth Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01548
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lugene Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walker v. Rochester Police Department et al
as 6:2020cv06552
Defendant:
Police Officer Erin Rodgers, New York Division of Parole, City of Rochester and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. The City of Rochester et al
as 1:2020cv00545
Defendant:
The City of Rochester, Police Officer Erin Rodgers, Police Officer Cory Roth and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rodgers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2019cv06721
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Foster et al v. McCabe et al
as 1:2019cv00843
Defendant:
Ofc. Thomas Degol, Lt. Jonathan Pietrzak, Ofc. Sean McPartland and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Rodgers and Cortez Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00677
Plaintiff:
Edward Rodgers and Judi Rodgers
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , Home Depot and John Doe, a customer of Home Depot (address unknown)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
