Cases 511 - 520 of 9,380
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Taylor v. The Finch Company
as 1:2022cv01794
Plaintiff:
Robert Taylor
Defendant:
The Finch Company doing business as Xhibition
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Shenoda v. I.C. System, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Mina Shenoda
Defendant:
I.C. System, Inc., AFNI, Inc. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Paddock Enterprises, LLC v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv01558
Plaintiff:
Paddock Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Filing Error. See 1:22cv01717
as 1:2022cv01716
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walsh v. Fawaky Burst South Euclid, LLC, et al.
as 1:2022mc00035
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Liu et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Xia-Ying Liu and Chu Tzu Yeh
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Antony Blinken and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Robertson v. Janoski-Haehlen et al
as 5:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Clark A. Robertson
Defendant:
Emily Janoski-Haehlen, Christopher J. Peters, Charles Oldfield and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
