Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Goodwin et al v. County of Summit, Ohio et al
as 5:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
Keith Goodwin and Keith Heating and Cooling, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Summit, Ohio , Russell M. Pry , John M. Labriola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Sydney Burke et al v. Mantua-Shalersville Fire Department et al
as 5:2013cv00761
Plaintiff:
Estate of Sydney Burke , Jeff P Burke , Patricia M Burke and others
Defendant:
Mantua-Shalersville Fire Department , Matthew L Roosa , Kenneth Justus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Bogard v. Bill of Vital Statistics Columbus, Ohio
as 1:2011cv02625
Plaintiff:
Ulysses C. Bogard
Defendant:
Bill of Vital Statistics Columbus, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Amin v. Russo et al
as 1:2011cv02576
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Amin
Defendant:
Nancy Margaret Russo , Bill Coyne, Bill Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thigpen v. Mason
as 1:2010cv02660
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo J. Thigpen
Defendant:
Bill Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bass v. White Castle Systems Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02715
Plaintiff:
Donald K. Bass
Defendant:
White Castle Systems Inc., Bill Ingram, Lisa Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. Fuerst et al
as 1:2009cv02276
Plaintiff:
John Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Gerald E. Fuerst and Bill Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gudenas v. Cervenik et al
as 1:2009cv02169
Plaintiff:
Edmund Gudenas
Defendant:
Bill Cervenik, Bill Cervenik, Bill Cervenik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.