Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Usher v. Chief US Marshal Illinois et al
as 4:2016cv01138
Petitioner:
Mathew Usher
Respondent:
Chief US Marshal Illinois, Chief US Marshal Alabama, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Osborne v. Chief U.S. Marshal, et al
as 4:2016cv00947
Petitioner:
Ajamu S Osborne
Respondent:
US Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sinkfield v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2016cv00948
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff Department and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Woodson v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Allen Woodson
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, U.S. Marshalls Office and St. Elizabeth Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Picone v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2015cv02047
Plaintiff:
Adam Picone
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Northeast Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Picone v. United States Marshal Service, et al.
as 4:2015cv02033
Plaintiff:
Adam Picone
Defendant:
Northeast Ohio Correctional Center and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. USA
as 3:2014cv02692
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dylan Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eayohen v. One Unknown Named FBI Special Agent et al
as 4:2014cv00751
Petitioner:
Moishe Eanone Eayohen
Respondent:
One Unknown Named FBI Special Agent, John Carroll, Michael Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sidikov v. Pugh, et al
as 4:2014cv00451
Petitioner:
Dilshod Sidikov
Respondent:
Michael Pugh, David M. Toepfer, Edward Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lichtenwalter et al v. Maier
as 5:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
Derek Lichtenwalter, Michael Ernest Williams, Courtney Marshall and others
Defendant:
George Maier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
