Cases 51 - 60 of 10,438
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Jones et al.
as 1:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lindsey
Defendant:
Officer Jones and Jane/John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnoff v. Ferguson
as 5:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Bruce Arnoff
Defendant:
Denise Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Larr v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Michael L. Larr
Respondent:
Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Winkel
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Justin Goins
Defendant:
Corporal Winkel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Belton
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Pietraszkiewicz et al.
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunn
Defendant:
Officer Ann Pietraszkiewicz, Detective Gregory Williams, Officer John Marincek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant:
Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson et al. v. Willoughby Hills P.D. et al.
as 1:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson and Latoya Brisco
Defendant:
Willoughby Hills P.D., Officer Boepple, Officer Coninenza and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Zachery v. Tussey et al.
as 5:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Mario C Zachery and Mario C. Zachery
Defendant:
Christian Tussey, Robert A. Toussant and City of Alliance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
