Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv02636
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Jones
Defendant:
Bryant & Stratton College and Clifford Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Matthew Schultz v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, et al
as 1:2011cv01046
Defendant:
Jon Namle, Karen Netherton, Julissa Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Matthew Schultz doing business as Whipstocking Idea Co. doing business as No Mow Yard Inc. doing business as Clothes Line Fashions LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2510
Jackson v. Moore et al
as 3:2010cv01096
Plaintiff:
Nakala Desirae Jackson
Defendant:
Ernie L Moore, Maggie Beightler, Kelly Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 3:2008cv02905
Plaintiff:
Amy Crawford, Amy Crawford and Amy Crawford
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Immerman et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Company et al
as 1:2008cv02112
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Immerman, Mark Spicknall and Robert P. Sweeney
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Gallucci et al v. Sears Roebuck & Company et al
as 1:2008cv01988
Plaintiff:
James E. Gallucci, James E. Gallucci, James E. Gallucci and others
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Company, Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Orosz v. Briggs & Stratton Corporation
as 3:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Orosz, Jr., Steven J. Orosz, Jr., Steven J. Orosz, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Briggs & Stratton Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Meros v. O'Donnell et al
as 1:2007cv00436
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Meros
Defendant:
Terrence O'Donnell, Paul E. Pfeifer, Judith Ann Lanzinger and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
