Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loper v. FBI-Cleveland Field Office et al
as 1:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Latasha Loper
Defendant:
FBI-Cleveland Field Office, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattice-Bey v. Rendon et al
as 1:2017cv00639
Plaintiff:
Jasaun Robert Mattice-Bey
Defendant:
Carole S. Rendon, Michelle M. Baeppler, James A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunstal v. Parnell et al
as 1:2017cv00313
Plaintiff:
Diego Tunstal
Defendant:
Jeffrey Parnell, Cleveland Police, Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Vecchiarelli et al
as 1:2016cv01693
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli, Solomon Oliver, Jr., F.B.I. Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv01639
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Criminal Investigative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Eayohen v. One Unknown Named FBI Special Agent et al
as 4:2014cv00751
Petitioner:
Moishe Eanone Eayohen
Respondent:
One Unknown Named FBI Special Agent, John Carroll, Michael Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Iskander v. FBI et al
as 4:2012cv02653
Plaintiff:
Hany M. Iskander
Defendant:
FBI, I.C.E., Ohio Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnard v. Wright State University et al
as 3:2011cv00985
Plaintiff:
Daniel P. Barnard
Defendant:
Wright State University, United States Navy and FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
