Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Sanchez et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
George Sanchez and Maria Sanchez
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. , Lumber Liquidators Leasing, LLC , Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Perez v. Sanchez, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01427
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Sanchez, Inc. and Lorenzo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanchez v. Warden of Grafton, Corr. Inst.
as 1:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden of Grafton, Corr. Inst.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ondo et al v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2013cv00762
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Clifford Kime, Thomas Tintelnot and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Ondo and Jonathan Simcox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Russo et al
as 1:2013cv00320
Plaintiff:
Javier Sanchez
Defendant:
Michael Russo and Tim McGinty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2012cv02344
Plaintiff:
Pablo Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23010
Plaintiff:
Cain Sanchez
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sanchez v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20898
Plaintiff:
Rose Sanchez
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
