Cases 41 - 50 of 85
United States of America v. Russo
as 1:2015mc00004
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Brad A. Russo
Buess et al v. Scafide et al
as 3:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
David Buess, Winona Mae Palmiotti and Winona Rosa Piscitelli
Defendant:
Lisa Scafide, Breann Kindinger, John Spon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coffin et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2014dp20505
Plaintiff:
Valerie Coffin and Brad J. Coffin
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Doe c/o The Law Office of Amanda A. Krzystan v. Ottawa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2014cv02153
Plaintiff:
John Doe c/o The Law Office of Amanda A. Krzystan
Defendant:
County of Ottawa , Jo Ellen Regal , Ottawa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01746
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Venson v. Franks et al
as 3:2014cv01027
Plaintiff:
Shaun L. Venson
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Franks, Brad A Smith and Julia R. Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Family Health Chiropractic, Inc. v. Biomedx Marketing, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Family Health Chiropractic, Inc.
Defendant:
Biomedx Marketing, LLC, Seminar Builders, Inc., Brad Mitchell Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Miller v. Franks et al
as 3:2014cv00268
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Miller
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Franks, Brad A Smith and Julia R Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
