Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Gill v. Eye Physician's and Surgeons Clinic et al
as 1:2013cv02829
Plaintiff:
Ali Gill
Defendant:
Eye Physician's and Surgeons Clinic, Ohio State University Medical Center, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Ohio State Court et al
as 1:2013cv02534
Plaintiff:
Joseph H. Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Ohio State Court and Richard McMonagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Director OSU Hospital et al
as 1:2013cv02395
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Williams
Defendant:
Director OSU Hospital and Ohio State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Hakos v. Ohio State Highway Patrol et al
as 1:2013cv01427
Plaintiff:
Patrick M Hakos
Defendant:
Jason P Demuth, Ohio State Highway Patrol and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Ohio, State of
as 4:2013cv01365
Petitioner:
William R. Miller
Respondent:
Ohio, State of and Christopher LaRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mumaw et al v. Ohio State Racing Commission et al
as 1:2013cv01048
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Mumaw , Joshua Mumaw and Eyes Of A Child Stables
Defendant:
Ohio State Racing Commission, William Crawford, Richard Kinsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baez v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00856
Plaintiff:
Santos Baez
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections and Ohio State University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ganaway v. Ohio, State of
as 1:2013cv00833
Plaintiff:
Clarence Ganaway
Defendant:
Ohio, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
