Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Nittolo v. Rushing et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02666
Petitioner: Michael Nittolo
Respondent: Roddie Rushing, U.S. Attorney General N.D. Ohio, General Counsel B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McQuillan v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2009cv02136
Petitioner: Malcolm McQuillan
Respondent: U.S. Attorney General and Mike O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nittolo v. U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02071
Plaintiff: Michael Nittolo
Defendant: U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio, General Counsel F.B.O.P., D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gitler et al v. Dann et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv02618
Plaintiff: Pat Gitler and Peaceful Acres Mobile Home Park
Defendant: Mark Dann, United States Attorney and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Almudallal v. USCIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02040
Plaintiff: Ali S. Almudallal
Defendant: USCIS, United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Cofield v. Tapia et al
as 4:2007cv01675
Petitioner: Keenan K. Cofield
Respondent: Robert M. Tapia, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cominsky v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2007cv01261
Plaintiff: James Cominsky
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Russell Csaszar, Scott Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?