Cases 61 - 70 of 82
Mubashshir et al
as 3:2010cv02501
Plaintiff:
Mujtabaa L. Mubashshir, Gibreal Jallow, Michael Robert and others
Defendant:
Ernie Moore, Warren Burbury, Jaquelyn Burn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodojev v. Sound Com Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01535
Plaintiff:
Joseph G. Rodojev
Defendant:
Sound Com Corporation , Timothy S Anderson , Craig M. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freeman v. Kelley
as 1:2010cv01413
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Bennie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
as 1:2010cv00765
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jon Freeman and Susan Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Gansheimer
as 4:2010cv00369
Petitioner:
Gentry William Freeman
Respondent:
Rich Gansheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Hardaway v. Costello et al
as 3:2009cv02989
Plaintiff:
Mario Hardaway
Defendant:
Donn Costello and Jeffery A. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. v. Freeman Health System et al
as 5:2009cv02588
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc., Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc. and Hitachi Medical Systems America, Inc.
Defendant:
Freeman Health System and Integrity Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Freeman v. City of Lyndhurst et al
as 1:2009cv02006
Defendant:
City of Lyndhurst, Richard Romano, Gregory R Traci and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
