Cases 61 - 70 of 149
United States of America v. Sippola
as 1:2014mc00070
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Glenn Sippola
Jefferys v. Supreme Court of Ohio et al
as 5:2014cv02083
Plaintiff:
Glenn J Jefferys, Jr.
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Ohio, David Tobin and Tom Rill Farm Drainage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chipner v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv01158
Plaintiff:
Glenn Chipner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tinney v. Richland County et al
as 1:2014cv00703
Defendant:
Richland County , Joseph Masi , James J. Mayer, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Tinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RBS Citizens National Association v. Nahra et al
as 1:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
RBS Citizens National Association
Defendant:
Glenn Nahra, Unknown Present Spouse, if any, of Glenn Nahra and Legends at Aberdeen Condominium Owners' Association, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Glenn Nahra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Osborne et al
as 1:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Gary F Peters
Defendant:
Richard M Osborne, Ian J Abrams, Wilbur Eugene Argo and others
Movant:
John Durgerian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Cadden et al
as 3:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Troy Marshall
Defendant:
Barry J. Cadden, Gregory Conigliaro, Lisa Conigliaro Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferrigno v. Osborne et al
as 1:2013cv02822
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ferrigno
Defendant:
Richard M. Osborne , Gregory J. Osborne , Thomas J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durgerian v. Osborne et al
as 1:2013cv02805
Plaintiff:
John Durgerian
Defendant:
Richard M. Osborne , Gregory J. Osborne , Thomas J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glenn v. Bunting
as 1:2013cv02574
Petitioner:
Jerrel T. Glenn
Respondent:
Jason Bunting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
