Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Lapso et al
as 1:2018cv00301
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dennis J. Lapso, Annette M. Ressetar, Ashtabula County Treasurer and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Bartter et al
as 5:2017cv00239
Defendant:
Bartter, Dominion Resources, Inc., NiSource Corporate Services Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rohrs, et al
as 3:2017cv00225
Defendant:
Rohrs, Dona Powell, United Telephone Company of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Commissioner:
David Rosenblum Cohen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC
as 5:2017cv00231
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
10.55 Acres of Land, More or Less in Ashland County, OHio OH-AS-005.000, Wayne Ralph Bartter, Trustee of the Wayne Ralph Bartter Trust dated April 28, 2008, Wayne Ralph Bartter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Sizemore v. Forsthoefel et al
as 1:2012cv02769
Plaintiff:
Terrie Sizemore
Defendant:
Ronald P. Forsthoefel , Farm Credit Services of Mid-America , Gregory Melick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Glick v. Farm Credit Services of Mid America, FLCA et al
as 5:2009cv02273
Plaintiff:
Nathan Glick
Defendant:
Farm Credit Services of Mid America, FLCA, Gregory Locke and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agstar Financial Services, FLCA et al v. Hopewell Dairy, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv02237
Defendant:
Chesterfield Dairy, L.L.C., DeLaval, Inc., State of Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation and others
Receiver:
Receiver John M. Roach
Plaintiff:
Agstar Financial Services, PCA and Agstar Financial Services, FLCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
