Cases 11 - 20 of 916
Folks et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Michael Folks and Sharon Manier
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Horsley et al v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christa Horsley, Sherry O'Neal and Albert Shifflett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. and Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Talbot-Jones v. Cinfed Federal Credit Union
as 1:2023cv00829
Plaintiff:
Christopher Talbot-Jones
Defendant:
CINFED Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Paige v. Cinfed Federal Credit Union
as 1:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Daniel Paige
Defendant:
Cinfed Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
McCall v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04171
Plaintiff:
Vail Pinkston McCall
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Richardson v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.
as 2:2023cv04190
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richardson
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Murphy Road Recycling, LLC v. Cathcart Rail, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03809
Plaintiff:
MURPHY ROAD RECYCLING, LLC
Defendant:
CATHCART RAIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Roto Rooter Services Company
as 1:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
FRANKENMUTH MUTUAL INSRANCE COMPANY and Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Roto Rooter Services Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
