Cases 101 - 110 of 323
Angle v. City of Newark, Ohio et al
as 2:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
Jerad R. Angle
Defendant:
City of Newark, Ohio , Barry Connell , John Brnjic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Columbus City Schools Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dennis T Carney
Defendant:
Columbus City Schools Board of Education, GARY L BAKER, II, Michael Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Harris v. Ervin et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Michael Ervin, Ronald Erdos and John and/or Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. vanBibber et al
as 2:2018cv00159
Plaintiff:
Richard White
Defendant:
Josh vanBibber, Hocking County Commissioners, Morgan County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Environmental Enterprises Inc v. Butler et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Environmental Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Craig W Butler, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Durham v. Niffenegger et al
as 1:2018cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Durham
Defendant:
Jerry Niffenegger, Mark Purdy, James Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHN DOE 1 et al v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 , Jane Doe #1 , John Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands International Inc , MOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, MOES 11-25 and others
Movant:
Roderick M. Hills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartley v. Collins et al
as 2:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Pam Hartley
Defendant:
Jamarkus Collins, Katrina Hallam, Sasha Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
