Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Lucinda Jones
Defendant:
Hamilton County, David McKeague, Judicial Counsel, U.S Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rossing v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Duane B. Rossing
Defendant:
United States Attorney General and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Poffenbarger v. Kendall et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Poffenbarger
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Richard Scobee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Charles v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
Adam Keith Charles
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schroyer v. United States Marshals Service
as 3:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Ronald Schroyer
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Ronald Combs
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Young v. City of Delaware et al
as 2:2021cv01477
Defendant:
Delaware Police Department, William Zoller, City of Delaware and others
Plaintiff:
William E Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
