Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Brown-Austin v. Chambers-Smith, et al.
as 1:2024cv00397
Defendant:
David Bobby, Unit Managment Chief Jeremy Oppy, Core Civic Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Brown-Austin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Curtis
Defendant:
Deborah Lewis, Doug Glispy, Bradford English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00797
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tate David Prows and Ann Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Laura Borso, Sam Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of Circleville et al
as 2:2023cv01474
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Allen Thomas
Defendant:
City of Circleville, Circleville Police Department, Ryan Speakman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Prows v. City of Oxford et al
as 1:2022cv00693
Plaintiff:
Tate Prows and Tate David Prows
Defendant:
City of Oxford, Chief John A. Jones, Michael Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guillard et al v. Pyle et al
as 2:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Gezelle Guillard, John Peterson and Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Justin Elekes, Kayla Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oppenheimer v. City of Madeira, Ohio et al
as 1:2020cv00371
Plaintiff:
DOUG OPPENHEIMER and Philip Douglas Oppenheimer
Defendant:
John Doe Nos. 1 to 10 and City of Madeira, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
